X’s Algorithm Boosted Musk and Trump Supporters Before Elections: Study Reveals
A recent study from Queensland University of Technology (QUT) has stirred controversy by suggesting that Elon Musk may have altered X’s (formerly Twitter) algorithm to favor his account and other conservative-leaning users. The changes reportedly coincide with Musk’s public endorsement of Donald Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign. The research, led by QUT’s digital media associate professor Timothy Graham and Monash University’s communications and media studies professor Mark Andrejevic, analyzed engagement patterns on the platform before and after Musk’s Trump endorsement. The results raise important questions about the influence of social media algorithms on political discourse and user behavior.
X Algorithm Tweaks and Increased Engagement: A Closer Look
The QUT study, which focused on engagement metrics around July 13th, 2023—just after Musk publicly endorsed Trump—revealed some striking changes. According to the data, Musk’s posts saw a 138% increase in views, while retweets surged by a staggering 238%. These dramatic increases in engagement were not mirrored across the platform at large, suggesting that something within the algorithm may have changed to favor Musk and similar right-wing voices.
The study’s authors, Graham and Andrejevic, noted that while other Republican-leaning accounts also experienced increased engagement during the same period, the increase was far more pronounced for Musk’s content. This, the researchers argue, could point to deliberate adjustments to the platform’s algorithm that selectively amplified conservative voices.
What the Data Shows: Increased Engagement for Musk and Right-Wing Accounts
Musk’s endorsement of Trump is seen as a pivotal moment in this timeline, which may have led to the observed spike in engagement. Starting in mid-July, both Musk’s account and several prominent conservative accounts began to see a notable uptick in activity, including higher rates of engagement with their posts, increased visibility, and greater interaction in the form of likes, shares, and retweets.
The QUT study, while not exhaustive, provides important insights into the mechanics behind this surge. The researchers found that Musk’s engagement rate notably outpaced the general trends across the platform. The period after Musk’s endorsement coincided with a larger wave of Republican-leaning content gaining attention, although the scale of this amplification seemed to be far more pronounced for Musk and his close allies.
Broader Implications: Right-Wing Bias in X’s Algorithm?
This new research adds weight to previous reports suggesting potential right-wing bias in X’s algorithms. Reports from sources like The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post had previously hinted at such bias, raising concerns about the platform’s role in shaping political discourse. Critics argue that algorithmic manipulation could have significant consequences for elections and democracy, given the immense reach of social media in modern politics.
The QUT researchers, however, acknowledge limitations in their study. They noted that due to restricted access to X’s Academic API, their dataset was smaller than they would have preferred. While they are confident in the data’s completeness, they cautioned that their analysis might not fully capture the scope of activity across all posts and accounts.
X Users Flee to Bluesky Amid Growing Frustration
While Musk’s endorsement of Trump and the subsequent changes in X’s algorithm have generated significant attention, they also seem to have contributed to growing discontent among users. As the platform’s algorithm increasingly favored certain accounts and political leanings, many users began to look for alternatives. The timing of Musk’s political endorsement coincided with a noticeable migration of users to Bluesky, a rival platform, during November 2023.
Reports indicate that Bluesky gained over 700,000 new users within a single week, largely driven by frustrations with X’s perceived political bias. Many users felt that the platform, under Musk’s leadership, had become more overtly partisan, prompting them to seek out alternative spaces for open discourse.
Bluesky, which was founded by former Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, has quickly gained traction among users disillusioned with X’s direction. The app’s decentralized approach and focus on user privacy have made it an attractive alternative for those concerned about the concentration of power in centralized social media platforms.
How X’s Algorithm Affects Political Discourse
The question of how social media algorithms influence political discourse is not a new one, but the revelations from the QUT study highlight the unique power these algorithms have in shaping public opinion. Social media platforms like X use algorithms to determine which content is seen by users and which gets buried in the feed. These algorithms are often designed to prioritize content that is likely to engage users, such as posts with high engagement or controversial topics. However, the way these algorithms operate can lead to unintended consequences, including the amplification of certain political viewpoints over others.
In the case of X, the platform’s algorithm may have contributed to the increased visibility of conservative voices, especially following Musk’s endorsement of Trump. While social media companies have long faced accusations of bias, the QUT study provides concrete evidence that algorithmic changes may have played a role in amplifying right-wing voices at a time when they were vying for greater political influence.
The Political Impact of Algorithmic Manipulation
The political impact of algorithmic manipulation is far-reaching. Social media platforms are central to the way modern political campaigns engage with voters, and the way content is filtered and amplified can have significant implications for the outcomes of elections. If the algorithms of platforms like X are seen to favor certain political ideologies or candidates, this could skew public opinion and undermine the fairness of democratic processes.
The revelations from the QUT study also raise questions about the role of private companies in shaping political discourse. While platforms like X have terms of service that users must abide by, there is increasing concern over the level of influence these platforms can exert over the political landscape. If social media companies are allowed to prioritize certain voices and viewpoints, they could potentially have an outsized role in influencing the decisions of voters.
Regulating Social Media Algorithms: Is It Time for Oversight?
Given the power that social media algorithms hold in shaping political and social discourse, many are calling for greater oversight and regulation. The QUT study and subsequent reports on X’s algorithmic biases highlight the need for transparency in how these algorithms work and how they prioritize content. Some experts argue that there should be stricter regulations to ensure that social media platforms do not abuse their power to amplify certain political viewpoints.
Governments around the world are beginning to take a closer look at the role of social media in political campaigns, with the European Union’s Digital Services Act being one example of increasing regulatory efforts. Whether similar regulations will be implemented in the United States or other countries remains to be seen, but the ongoing debate over social media’s role in politics is likely to continue.
Conclusion
The findings of the QUT study provide new insight into how X’s algorithm may have been adjusted to favor conservative voices, particularly around the time of Elon Musk’s endorsement of Donald Trump. While the data reveals a clear increase in engagement for Musk’s posts and other right-wing accounts, the potential implications of these algorithmic changes are still unfolding. As frustrations with the platform grow and users migrate to alternatives like Bluesky, it is clear that social media’s influence on politics is a topic that will continue to provoke debate and scrutiny.
The growing calls for greater transparency and regulation of social media algorithms suggest that this issue will only become more prominent in the years to come. As the 2024 U.S. presidential election approaches, the role of platforms like X in shaping political discourse will be watched closely.
FAQs About X’s Algorithm Changes and Political Bias
1. How did Musk’s endorsement of Trump affect his engagement on X?
After Musk endorsed Trump in July 2023, his posts saw a significant increase in engagement, with views rising by 138% and retweets increasing by 238%.
2. Did other conservative accounts experience similar increases in engagement?
Yes, several other conservative-leaning accounts also saw increases in engagement, though Musk’s account experienced the most dramatic rise.
3. What did the QUT study reveal about the changes in X’s algorithm?
The study found that X’s algorithm favored Musk and conservative accounts, especially around the time of Musk’s endorsement of Trump, leading to increased visibility and engagement.
4. Why did users migrate to Bluesky?
Many users became frustrated with X’s perceived political bias and algorithmic changes, leading to a significant migration to Bluesky, a rival platform.
5. What are the broader implications of these algorithmic changes?
The algorithmic shifts on X raise concerns about political bias, the role of social media in elections, and the need for greater oversight and transparency in how these platforms operate.
SEE ALSO:
